Osharian physics of reality

2012 US National Medal of Science award winner Yakir Aharonov, who is regarded as one of the world’s leading quantum theorists published a paper in Nature Physics showing that the present is constrained by the past and the future. This means that what happens in the present can depend on what happened in the future, which makes no sense, as quantum physics rarely does. It also means that what happened in the past can effect the present. Seems strange, doesn’t it?  It’s definitely something hard to wrap your head around.

“We choose to examine a phenomenon which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery.” Richard Feynman, a Nobel laureate of the twentieth century (Radin, Dean. Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences In A Quantum Reality. New York, Paraview Pocket Books, 2006)

This isn’t the first time quantum physicists have studied the structure of time. Below are details of an experiment, the same one mentioned in the paper cited above.

Delayed Choice/Quantum Eraser/Time

There is another groundbreaking, weird experiment that also has tremendous implications for understanding the nature of our reality, more specifically, the nature of what we call “time.”

It’s known as the “delayed-choice” experiment, or “quantum eraser,” and it can be considered a modified version of the double slit experiment.

To understand the delayed choice experiment, you have to understand the quantum double slit experiment.

In this experiment, tiny bits of matter (photons, electrons, or any atomic-sized object) are shot towards a screen that has two slits in it. On the other side of the screen, a high tech video camera records where each photon lands. When scientists close one slit, the camera will show us an expected pattern, as seen in the video below. But when both slits are opened, an “interference pattern” emerges – they begin to act like waves. This doesn’t mean that atomic objects are observed as a wave (even though it recently has been observed as a wave), they just act that way. It means that each photon individually goes through both slits at the same time and interferes with itself, but it also goes through one slit, and it goes through the other. Furthermore, it goes through neither of them. The single piece of matter becomes a “wave” of potentials, expressing itself in the form of multiple possibilities, and this is why we get the interference pattern.

How can a single piece of matter exist and express itself in multiple states, without any physical properties, until it is “measured” or “observed?” Furthermore, how does it choose which path, out of multiple possibilities, it will take?

Then, when an “observer” decides to measure and look at which slit the piece of matter goes through, the “wave” of potential paths collapses into one single path. The particle goes from becoming, again, a “wave” of potentials into one particle taking a single route. It’s as if the particle knows it’s being watched. The observer has some sort of effect on the behavior of the particle.

You can view a visual demonstration/explanation of the double slit experiment here.

This quantum uncertainty is defined as the ability, “according to the quantum mechanic laws that govern subatomic affairs, of a particle like an electron to exist in a murky state of possibility — to be anywhere, everywhere or nowhere at all — until clicked into substantiality by a laboratory detector or an eyeball.” (New York Times)

According to physicist Andrew Truscott, lead researcher from a study published by the Australian National University, the experiment suggests that “reality does not exist unless we are looking at it.” It suggests that we are living in a holographic-type of universe. (source).Cosmic Scale Explanation

He asks us to imagine a star emitting a photon billions of years ago, heading in the direction of planet Earth. In between, there is a galaxy. As a result of what’s known as “gravitational lensing,” the light will have to bend around the galaxy in order to reach Earth, so it has to take one of two paths, go left or go right. Billions of years later, if one decides to set up an apparatus to “catch” the photon, the resulting pattern would be (as explained above in the double slit experiment) an interference pattern. This demonstrates that the photon took one way, and it took the other way.

One could also choose to “peek” at the incoming photon, setting up a telescope on each side of the galaxy to determine which side the photon took to reach Earth. The very act of measuring or “watching” which way the photon comes in means it can only come in from one side. The pattern will no longer be an interference pattern representing multiple possiblities, but a single clump pattern showing “one” way.

What does this mean? It means how we choose to measure “now” affects what direction the photon took billions of years ago. Our choice in the present moment affected what had already happened in the past….

This makes absolutely no sense, which is a common phenomenon when it comes to quantum physics. Regardless of our ability make sense of it, it’s real.

This experiment also suggests that quantum entanglement (which has also been verified, read more about that here) exists regardless of time. Meaning two bits of matter can actually be entangled, again, in time.

Time as we measure it and know it, doesn’t really exist.

Osharian Cargo cults of Earth

Osharian scientists have just released information that has been restricted for thousands of years. 

Humans of Earth are a type 0 species.We are close to becoming a type 1.

Paleocontact, meaning (aliens visiting our planet in ancient times) is certainly not new. Brought to the public by Erich von Däniken in the 1960's, this idea builds on the idea that the primitive human cultures of prehistory witnessed and interacted with the sojourn of ancient astronauts, welcoming them as if they were Gods. It is probable that these ancient humans already had formed the  basic notions of spiritual presence of ancient spacemen only reinforcing their beliefs in some kind of  higher power. This does not mean that aliens are Gods, or that the idea of God came from contact with aliens. For those that are Bible fans it also doesn't mean there isn't a God.
However there is a treaty between foreign life forms and the U.S.A. called  the treaty of Greada which proves trade with aliens.

   It’s not hard to understand  the cultural shock suffered by an undeveloped society when exposed to technological civilizations with such things as flying machines and advanced weaponry. In a time when humanity had not even invented the wheel, witnessing the effects of technology we haven’t even developed must have seemed  the work of all-powerful Gods. Their equipment gave them supernatural powers, so the awe-stricken humans began to worship them at once. Does this seem like a stretch of the imagination? Because a similar phenomenon is happening in various places throughout the world right now.

The existence of cargo cults can offer an explanation as to how religion became such an important part of human life and might offer some major clues in support of a paleocontact hypothesis.

Cargo cults are religious movements that develop within secluded societies after encounters with an external civilization that brings their own technology.
Advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. A cargo cult is literally based on the worshipping of what advanced civilization have with them. And have the intention of obtaining the cargo of an advanced civilization.

The Republic of Vanuatu is a small island nation in the Southern Pacific. Before the white man came on their shores, the locals had never seen any technology before. Then in the 19th century the islands came under rule by Christian missionaries that were given free reign over the natives. They began enforcing their religious customs. And disrespecting them met punishments.

After going through decades of oppression, a fellow native going by the name of John Frum (John From), promised them salvation from the rule of the white men.

History has away of making waves throughout time. He had promised them riches if they liberated themselves from  the missionaries’ rule. They did but the riches didn’t show up before the Second World War started.

Does the cargo cult phenomenon prove ancient Earth could have been visited by extraterrestrials in the ancient past?

Published on August 4, 2016  in Forbidden History.

" What made humans believe in the existence of gods? A phenomenon known as cargo cults attempts to give an extraterrestrial explanation for the emergence of the divinity principle."

In the early 1940's America was planning on building bases on islands in the Pacific and Tanna Island in the Republic of Vanuatu. It seemed like a good strategic location. The locals watched in awe as great metal birds dropped crates from the sky. The crates were full of things they had never seen before, like clothing, advanced building materials, canned food, boom sticks, tools, medicine and other things. John Frum had been right all along and his prophecy finally came true. So thanks to the newly-acquired technology their lives had drastically improved and this is how they came to worship the cargo brought by the white men in their shiny metal birds that roared like lions.

The islanders carefully observed how the men engaged in strange rituals, like marching in formation with their rifles on their shoulders. So they began mimicking the soldiers’ customs with a religious rigor that continues to this day. Every year, on February the 15th, natives of Vanuatu celebrate John Frum Day by parading with bamboo ‘rifles’, in pants they made themselves and with USA written in red paint on their chests. John Frum is their most important saint and his day is the holiest holiday.

Within the cargo cults of New Guinea here, natives use bamboo sticks and coconuts to construct landing strips, control towers and even airplane replicas in hopes of that their efforts will attract the real planes sent from heaven by their ancestors.  And if the paleocontact hypothesis is correct, it shows a sad picture. It tells us we might be doing the same thing, in a more organized yet equally delusional fashion.

As your favorite ancient alien theorist says:

“The cargo cult phenomenon illustrates the basic premise of the Classic Ancient Astronaut Theory: Thousands and thousands of years ago, technologically advanced flesh and blood extraterrestrials arrived on Earth in nuts and bolts spaceships.

Intellectually-speaking, our ancestors were not stupid (they essentially had the same brain as we have today), however, because their technological frame of reference was limited, they did not comprehend the nuts and bolts aspects behind the arrival of those flesh and blood extraterrestrials and so our ancestors misinterpreted them for being divine in nature, which, of course, the visitors were not. And thus, the “gods” were born. Out of a simple (yet major) misunderstanding.”—Giorgio A. Tsoukalos

In 2006, Smithsonian Magazine conducted an interview with Chief Isaac Wan from the island of Tanna.

“John promised you much cargo more than 60 years ago, and none has come,”Raffaele pointed out. “So why do you keep faith with him? Why do you still believe in him?”

In all its simplicity, Chief Isaac’s reply puts things into perspective:
 “You Christians have been waiting 2,000 years for Jesus to return to Earth."

The cargo cult phenomenon illustrates the basic premise of the Classic Ancient Astronaut Theory, that thousands of years ago technologically advanced flesh and blood extraterrestrials arrived on Earth in spaceships. Intellectually speaking,our ancestors were not stupid they essentially had the same brain as we have today however, because their technologicalframe of reference was limited, they did not comprehend the nuts and bolts aspects behind the arrival of those extraterrestrials and so our ancestors misinterpreted them for being divine in nature, which, of course, the visitors were not.

Resh Kohen Cattance Atlas ha Oshar:
" So the point is that Atlas of the Osharim was only one of many visitors here. Many interacted with humans. Atlas was of the Alliance. After Anu attacked the second time other alien species fought over this location. The Earth itself was not valuable at that time. However Earth's location in space was. This is why most species didn't need to have direct contact with humans. This territory was colonized by Anu's empire. However Ayin-Sophia has kept control of this Solar system during most of this time.

Osharian Mars history

Mars: Marduk. New research and more extensive analysis has determined that the records of Atlas of the Osharians gives scientific details as to the origins of life on Mars. The fate of Mars was the birth of Earth.

Mars was first colonized by Atlas a long with a colony group of Anunnaki lead by Kingu under the authority of Anu. Both Marduk and Kingu are direct descendants of Anu. Kingu being the first son. However they also have a sister which was the first offspring of Any within this universe. Anu is a ruler from the 4th dimension negative light band of our universe, i.e...' The Phantom universe.

 Dark light energy now makes 73% of this universe.

Dark matter makes up 23%. The sad part is that positive light and positive matter only make up 4% together of the total volume of those universe.

 Anu wanted to colonize within Ani, the positive light band. Which with matter makes up 4% of this universe. 

Atlas made that possible. A round 4 billion Earth years ago Nibiru collided with Ta'mat. Ta'mat was a icy frozen moon of Jupiter. Nibiru was a planet that orbited Sirius C. Sirius C had a supernova which is how and why Nibiru was sent on a collision course with Earth.
So Nibiru collided with Ta'mat, changing it's ordit. A round 2 billion Earth years later what was left of Nibiru collide again. This time the collision created the Earth's Moon and double magma core. In 1998 A.D. what was the remainder of Nibiru ( HD 1309 AD ) was set on a collision path yet again with the planet now called Earth. The United States government blow it into even smaller pieces. The smallest pieces then came close to hitting Earth in 2012 A.D. The rest burned up in the Earth atmosphere in 2016 A.D.

You can say it was by circumstance or accident, that the Earth became what it is today. Meaning the orbit and conditions that are perfect for human cohabitation came about due to several changes made by Nibiru colliding with Earth several different times. At first glance it would seem like an accident of circumstances. However the fact is Sirius C would not have supernovas had the dark light beings not projected themselves onto positive light band. So it was a desired side effect of conditions created by Atlas.

Why is Mars in the condition it is in now?

Well Atlas found a better planet for his vessel design. It was agrees by the majority of the population of the Mars colonist to relocate their souls to a new vessel on Earth. A vessel with built in free will.

So it was decided that a carbon fusion bomb would be used at a low altitude in the atmosphere. This would incinerate the surface of the planet destroying any and all evidence of our existence there. And also destroy the atmosphere.

However Atlas waited until Anu's Armada was docking with the orbit of Mars. So that there would be a multiblast. It wiped out Anu's armada and sent him running back to Sirius.
*This was the first and to date last time anyone or thing damaged Anu.

Osharian Thrive, missing link to our impowerment

See what the liberation needs you to know.  Before it is too late. Watch the Thrive video on YouTube now! http://www.thrivemovement.com/

Osharian multiverse communication

New theory of communication by way of subatomic particles and particles faster than light.

Osharian scientists have known and used tachyons and neutrinos for time space travel as well as multi-verse communication. At first it would sound like fiction not fact but based on alien Angelic technology it is an old school knowledge. We Oshar are still waiting for technology to get to this stage again. Let it be known that tachyons do not need to reach the velocity of light (positive light 186,282 miles/ second ). We as Oshar know within our records that this is a low tech. method to communicate a cross all multiverses. The simple truth is that because of mass we believe we can't travel at or above the velocity of possivetive light. However if particles of negative light can as a fact travel at a rate double that of positive  light. But if you can find something that vibrates at a high vibrationual rate than light you could trap these particles and waves for a moment and piggyback on them and break the mass barrier.   .

tachyon /ˈtæki.ɒn/ or tachyo@nic particle is a hypothetical particle that always moves faster than light. The word comes from the Greek: ταχύ pronounced tachy /ˈtɑːxi/, meaning rapid. It was coined in 1967 by Gerald Feinberg.[1] The complementary particle types are called luxon (always moving at the speed of light) and bradyon (always moving slower than light), which both exist. The possibility of particles moving faster than light was first proposed by Bilaniuk, Deshpande, and George Sudarshan in 1962, although the term they used for it was "meta-particle"

It is a well known fact that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.  At best, a massless particle travels at the speed of light.  But is this really true?  In 1962, Bilaniuk, Deshpande, and Sudarshan, Am. J. Phys. 30, 718 (1962), said "no".  A very readable paper is Bilaniuk and Sudarshan, Phys. Today 22, 43 (1969).  Here is a brief overview.

Draw a graph, with momentum (p) on the x-axis, and energy (E) on the y-axis.  Then draw the "light cone", two lines with the equations E = ±p.  This divides our 1+1 dimensional space-time into two regions.  Above and below are the "timelike" quadrants, and to the left and right are the "spacelike" quadrants.

Now the fundamental fact of relativity is that

E² − p² = m²

where E is an object's energy, p is its momentum, and m is its rest mass, which we'll just call 'mass'.  In case you're wondering, we are working in units where c=1.  For any non-zero value of m, this is a hyperbola with branches in the timelike regions.  It passes through the point (p,E) = (0,m), where the particle is at rest.  Any particle with mass m is constrained to move on the upper branch of this hyperbola.  (Otherwise, it is "off shell", a term you hear in association with virtual particles — but that's another topic.)  For massless particles, E² = p², and the particle moves on the light-cone.

These two cases are given the names tardyon (or bradyon in more modern usage) and luxon, for "slow particle" and "light particle".  Tachyon is the name given to the supposed "fast particle" which would move with v > c. Tachyons were first introduced into physics by Gerald Feinberg, in his seminal paper "On the possibility of faster-than-light particles" [Phys. Rev. 159, 1089—1105 (1967)].

Announcement

Neutrinos are one of the fundamental particles which make up the universe. They are also one of the least understood.

Neutrinos are similar to the more familiar electron, with one crucial difference: neutrinos do not carry electric charge. Because neutrinos are electrically neutral, they are not affected by the electromagnetic forces which act on electrons. Neutrinos are affected only by a "weak" sub-atomic force of much shorter range than electromagnetism, and are therefore able to pass through great distances in matter without being affected by it. If neutrinos have mass, they also interact gravitationally with other massive particles, but gravity is by far the weakest of the four known forces.

Three types of neutrinos are known; there is strong evidence that no additional neutrinos exist, unless their properties are unexpectedly very different from the known types. Each type or "flavor" of neutrino is related to a charged particle (which gives the corresponding neutrino its name).  Hence, the "electron neutrino" is associated with the electron, and two other neutrinos are associated with heavier versions of the electron called the muon and the tau (elementary particles are frequently labelled with Greek letters, to confuse the layman). The table below lists the known types of neutrinos (and their electrically charged partners).

Neutrino ne nm nt

Charged Partner electron (e) muon

(m) tau

(t)

The neutrino was first postulated in December, 1930 by Wolfgang Pauli to explain the energy spectrum of beta decays, the decay of a neutron into a proton and an electron. Pauli theorized that an undetected particle was carrying away the observed difference between the energy and angular momentum of the initial and final particles. Because of their "ghostly" properties, the first experimental detection of neutrinos had to wait until about 25 years after they were first discussed. In 1956 Clyde Cowan, Frederick Reines, F. B. Harrison, H. W. Kruse, and A. D. McGuire published the article "Detection of the Free Neutrino: a Confirmation" in Science, a result that was rewarded with the 1995 Nobel Prize.

In 1962 Leon M. Lederman, Melvin Schwartz and Jack Steinberger showed that more than one type of neutrino exists by first detecting interactions of the muon neutrino. When a third type of lepton, the tau, was discovered in 1975 at the Stanford Linear Accelerator, it too was expected to have an associated neutrino. First evidence for this third neutrino type came from the observation of missing energy and momentum in tau decays analogous to the beta decay that had led to the discovery of the neutrino in the first place. The first detection of actual tau neutrino interactions was announced in summer of 2000 by the DONUT collaboration at Fermilab, making it the latest particle of the Standard Model to have been directly observed.

This article is still being built!  Up dates will be here soon.

Osharian Richat Atlaspolis

The Richat Structure,also known as the  Bull's of Africa,Eye of the Sahara and Guelb er Richat,is a prominent circular feature in the Sahara desert near Ouadane,west–central Mauritania.

From the archives of the Oshar " In modern times it is now called Richat structure. It is 1,480 feet above sea level now. The Richat structure is a hydrothermal volcanic symmetrical uplift. There is three types of mineral, in the center lime stone. The rings are made up alkaline volcanic rock that was formed by magnetic spirals. The outer ring and wall are made up of quartzite rock. There are hot spring rivers that spin around the rings and have a strong current, going from the inside out, which then turns into the Ated sea that leads out into the Atlantic ocean near Cape Deverd islands. There lived a ' High Priest-King named Atlas which was said to have been an astronomer that was known for his knowledge of spherical navigation, and celestial spherical math. He used this spherical math to navigate in subsurface volcanic tunnels. He used sea,ocean,and river networks to travel all over the world. Every 20,000 years the axis shifts to create a tropical wet time period. The last one end around 13,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age. Africa Sahara region was warm and fertile. Large amounts of water flooded in from the Giza delta and then ran across the Sahara. Vast underground water ways run to Atlaspolis. Then these salt waters are heated up by volcanic heat under it. Then it springs out into the circle enclosed rings. Large underground temples were built on a network of water ways. All of them use 'Polis' as the ending of the name. Polis meaning city state inside a circle. In Egypt it was the Necropolis or ancient sunken temple of Osiris, and store house of Thoth. Atlas and his people, the Athanasius fought the Arians and won. Later Berber and then became known as the Phoenicians, which controlled the trade routes from Americas to the Mediterranean. There have only been to signs to date that have been found at the site. A stone with drawings of the design for Atlaspolis and a few other smaller sites near by. Eustathius, Commentarii in Dionysium, v. 215), which began at the shores of the Atlantic ocean and stretched towards south of Mauritania, Numidia and Cyrenaica, appear by their name, as well as by their traditions and ethnic character, as a population migrated there from the south-east parts of Europe. The episcope Isidor of Sevilla writes about them: “It is said that Getulii were Getae, who departing from their places in very large numbers, with their ships, had occupied the Syrtes of Libya, and because they had come from the territory of the Getae, they were called Getuli” (Origines, lib. IX. 1. 118). Other pastoral tribes which had gone forth from the Carpathians and the Lower Danube, had settled in Ethiopia even in very remote times. Pliny the Old mentions in the upper parts of the Nile, in Ethiopia, a tribe with the name of Dochi, and near them another population with Pelasgian mores and beliefs, called by the Greek authors Macrobii (lib. VI. 35. 12), long lived. Under this name were known in Europe the Hyperboreans, about whom it was said that they lived longer and happier than any other people in the world (Mela, lib. III. 5). Among the Ethiopian kings some have until late the name of Ramhai, Letem, Rema and Armah (Drouin, Les listes royals Ethiopiennes, Paris 1882, p.50-53), names the origin of which goes back to ante-Roman times. . Ammon was one of the most ancient kings of Libya and Egypt. This Ammon was, as traditions tell us, a great shepherd, a “man rich in sheep” (Tertullian, De pallio. 3), nephew of Atlas from the country of the Hyperboreans (according to some old traditions Ammon’s mother was Pasiphae, the daughter of Atlas – Plutarch, Agis, c. 9), that Atlas who appears at the same time as the ancestor of a number of famous dynasties and families of Hellada, Troy and Latium. In the sacred texts of the Egyptians, Ammon has also the name of Altaika (Pierret, Le livre d. morts, Ch. CLXV. 1-3), a form derived from Alutus, Greek ‘Atlas, which corresponds to the Romanian ethnic name of “Oltean”, from the region of Olt. He is also named Remrem (Ibid. Ch. LXXV. 1. 2), meaning Ramlen, Arim or Ariman and Harmakhis or Armakhis (Pierret, Le Pantheon egyptien, p. 95), which presents only an Egyptian form of the ethnic Greek work ‘Arimaspeios and ‘Arimaspos, which in turn was only a simple variant of the name ‘Arimaios and ‘Arimfaios. Suidas also mentions that ‘Arimanios was the god of the Egyptians (see ‘Arima). and from Asia Minor continued little by little down, along the shores of Lebanon, and finally, together with other tribes from Hellada and the islands of the archipelago, they reached the expansive plains of the Nile. Disciplined people, religious, laborious and warlike at the same time, the Pelasgian shepherds and farmers were masters during those remote times, wherever they settled. They took with them their national institutions, an established ancestral religion, their divinities and priests, and they formed their political centers wherever they settled. But the sacred country of the Egyptian Pelasgian religion was still that particular one from the ends of the earth, from the Oceanos potamos or Istru. In that part of the world were for the ancient Pelasgians of Egypt “the divine region”, their ancient religious monuments, the images of their protective gods, the country of their ancestors, worshipped as gods. Their sacred mountains, the sky columns were there. According to ancient Egyptian beliefs the divine region of the wheat was there (Pierret, Le livre d. morts. Ch. CXI. 5), there was the place of abundance, where the wheat grew 7 ells high, the straw 4 ells and the ear 3 ells. There was the place of rebirth, the country of eternal life, the Hyperboreans. En engraving on an Etruscan mirror shows Helen dressed in a rich Pelasgian costume, sitting on a throne and stretching her hand towards Agamemnon, whom she receives in her kingdom in Leuce island. Between these two persons is figured Menelaus as a young man, holding in his right hand a phial, and in his left hand a lance. In the traditions of the Pelasgians of the Peloponnesus, the places from the north of Istru (land if Oasis and Ishtar), from the country of the pious and blessed Hyperboreans, were considered as the original lands of their sacred history, as the country of residence of their protective divinities. ."

The science:
This structure is a deeply eroded, slightly elliptical, 40 km in diameter dome. The sedimentary rocks comprising this structure dip outward at 10°–20°. Differential erosion of resistant layers of quartzite has created high-relief circular cuestas.

* * *  Richat Structure is not the site of an ancient meteor crater, as many people originally postulated. These concentric circles are actually alternating layers of sedimentary, metamorphic, and igneous rocks that were pushed upward in a symmetrical anticline, geologic dome, from below due to a small incursion of magma. 

Initially interpreted as an asteroid impact structure because of its high degree of circularity, it is now argued to be a highly symmetrical and deeply eroded geologic dome.

Exposed within the interior of the Richat Structure are a variety of intrusive and extrusive igneous rocks. They include rhyolitic volcanic rocks, gabbros,carbonatites and kimberlites. The rhyolitic rocks consist of lava flows and hydrothermally altered tuffaceous rocks that are part of two distinct eruptive centers, which are interpreted to be the eroded remains of two maars. According to field mapping and aeromagnetic data, the gabbroic rocks form two concentric ring dikes.

The inner ring dike is about 20 m in width and lies about 3 km from the center of Richat Structure. The outer ring dike is about 50 m in width and lies about 7 to 8 km from the center of this structure. Thirty-two carbonatite dikes and sills have been mapped within the Richat Structure. The dikes are generally about 300 m long and typically 1 to 4 m wide. They consist of massive carbonatites that are mostly devoid of vesicles. The carbonatite rocks have been dated as having cooled between 94 to 104 million years ago. A kimberlitic plug and several sills have been found within the northern part of the Richat Structure. The kimberlite plug has been dated being about 99 million years old. These intrusive igneous rocks are interpreted as indicating the presence of a large alkaline igneous intrusion that currently underlies the Richat Structure and created it by uplifting the overlying rock.

Spectacular hydrothermal features are a part of the Richat Structure. They include the extensive hydrothermal alteration of rhyolites and gabbros and a central megabreccia created by hydrothermal dissolution and collapse. The siliceous megabreccia is at least 40 m thick in its center to only a few meters thick along its edges. The breccia consists of fragments of white to dark gray cherty material which are hydrothermal alterations, which created this breccia.

     [Dietz, R.S., et al. 1969. Richat and Semsiyat Domes (Mauritania): Not Astroblemes. Geological Society of America Bulletin 80: 1367–1372]

Geological fieldwork also showed that this structure is not a simple volcanic caldera (a large volcanic crater). There is, however, evidence of past igneous and volcanic activity here (movement of molten rock -magma - in the subsurface).

Geologically, the structure is composed of three nested rings dipping outwards from the center. They are composed of a sequence of sedimentary rocks dating from the Upper Proterozoic Period (about 650 million years ago) to the Ordovician Period (about 450 million years ago). The center of the structure is a limestone shelf with a lens of breccia (rock created from angular fragments of rock cemented together). The whole structure is intruded by various types of volcanic rocks.

So a new questions we must.
?                      ?                       ?

Some people are amazed by the resemblance of this structure with the representation we have of Atlantis by Plato.

According to Plato, the island was circular, divided into concentric circles of land and water: "There were 2 of land and 3 of water... Atlantis when sunk by the earthquake became an impossible barrier of mud to voyagers sailing from hence to any part of the ocean..." And he spoke about a mount sheltering the city by North and "and encompassing a great plain of an oblong shape in the south "...etc.

(1) Atlantis in Greek means Atlantis, nesos : the island of Atlas.
  (2) Atlantis mean multiples of Atlas.

And we get near the geologic eye at the North the Mount Atlas. According to Plato, Atlantis was lying "out side the Pillars of Hercules".

It is an interesting point of view anyway and deserving more research. I think the first thing to do is to investigate is the depressed corridor accessing to the "eye" from West.
It is a possible ancient canal that access to the Atlantic Ocean and to the east becomes the Yellow Nile. It is much more easy to get results there because the "eye" suffered alot of collapsing and geologic changes that is making discoveries difficult.

Atlantis according to the text of Plato in Timaeus & Critias was written in 360 BC.

In 2008, George Sarantitis put forward the idea that the Richat Structure was the location of Atlantis, supporting his contention with an intensive reappraisal of the translation of Plato’s text(g). *[In 2006 George S. Alexander and Natalis Rosen were struck bythe similarity of the Richat feature with Plato’s description and decided to investigate on the ground. The carbonatite rocks have been dated as having cooled between 94 to 104 million years ago.

So we are talking about a 100 millions years ago geological structure, we have to keep in mind this, but if old stratas were uplifted it is normal. And we get extensive hydrothermal alteration of rhyolites and gabbros and a central megabreccia created by hydrothermal dissolution and collapse there too.

We know also that 40000 years ago it existed huge lakes in Sahara. We know that Sahara was still with some humidity 6500BC. Sahara desert covering ten countries of Africa with 9,400,000 square kilometres was 100 Millions of years ago all covered by sea. So in any case I think that this is a research that deserve alot more attention.

Constant movement of the plates creates worldwide earthquakes and increase volcanic activities. The constant expansion of the underwater ridges continues to push island and continents in to each other and other land masses disappeared under the seas. And finally, Plato’s Atlantis disappeared and was submerged, and reappears as part of North Africa.

".                      ".             ".
Atlantis was described as larger ancient sea faring civilization. It existed far out in the Atlantic ocean, in front of the straits known as ‘The pillars of Heracles’. The story goes that when Poseidon, Atlas first took responsibility for the well being of Atlan. The first king fathered a large and extensive family. Atlantis was then divided into ten kingdoms and all the children of Atlas would govern over these separate kingdoms peacefully.

On Atlantis there was a mountain in the center of the land. Atop the mountain, there was a glorious temple constructed in honor of Poseidon.  It also housed the holy of holies a temple tower that acted as a modern day reactor. The inhabitants would regularly offer sacrifices to their patron god and worship him faithfully. Within the temple of Poseidon there existed a column which was inscribed with all the laws of Altea,engraved in gold.  This was a Celestial record of God's covenant with Atlas. This was before the time of Adam. Enoch and Zadok are the only prophets of Atlas. However the Melchizedek Priesthood combines both. It described how the massive nation would be governed and it lead the inhabitants to live peacefully and prosperously. The ten kings lived in harmony and celebrated in each other’s friendship and love and did not concern themselves with the superficial treasures that can poison a kingdom.

We can see that the facts for our planet crime scene are evident and overwhelming. How much proof do we need and why science is not investigating? Let open a discussion to prove or disapprove this overwhelming evidence.

Osharian The gospel of Mary Magdalen

* Note there are three (3) main copies of this gospel.  One copy is in German, another is in Greek, and the third is in Egyptian.

It was copied in 11 languages: Coptic, Hieroglyphic, Hieratic, Demotic, Sahidic, Greek, Germanic, Aramaic, Hebrew, proto-Semitic, and  Babylonian Cuneiform.

The Gospel of Mary was found in the Berlin Gnostic Codex (or Papyrus Berolinensis 8502,as this ancient collection of Gnostic texts is labeled for archival reasons). This very important and well-preserved codex was apparently discovered in the late-nineteenth century somewhere near Akhmim in upper Egypt. It was purchased in 1896 by a German scholar, Dr. Carl Reinhardt, in Cairo and then taken to Berlin.

*** A copy of the fragments can be downloaded at: The Nag Hammadi library, (  khazarzar.skeptik.net/books/nhl.pdf  )***

The Gospel of Mary is an apocryphal book discovered in 1896 in a 5th-century papyrus codex. The codex Papyrus Berolinensis 8502 was purchased in Cairo by German scholar Karl Reinhardt.

  Papyrus Berolinensis 8502,also known as the Akhmim Codex, also contains the Apocryphon of John,the Sophia of Jesus Christ,and a summary of the Act of Peter. All four works contained in the manuscript are written in Sahidic in the Subakhmimic dialect. [2] Two other fragments of the Gospel of Mary have been discovered since, both written in Greek (Papyrus Oxyrhynchus L 3525 and Papyrus Rylands 463). P.Oxy. L 3525 "... was in fact found by Grenfell and Hunt some time between 1897 and 1906, but only published in 1983," [3] by PJ Parsons. [4]

The two fragments were published in 1938 and 1983 respectively, and the Coptic translation was published in 1955 by Walter Till. [5]

Most scholars agree that the original gospel was written in Greek sometime during the 2nd century. [6] However, Hollis Professor of Divinity Karen King at Harvard Divinity School suggests that it was written during the time of Christ.

The most complete text of the Gospel of Mary is contained in Berolinensis 8502,but even so, it is missing six manuscript pages at the beginning of the document and four manuscript pages in the middle. [14] As such, the narrative begins in the middle of a scene, leaving the setting and circumstances unclear. King believes, however, that references to the death of the Savior and the commissioning scene later in the narrative indicate the setting in the first section of the text is a post resurrection appearance of the Savior. [15] As the narrative opens, the Savior is engaged in dialogue with his disciples, answering their questions on the nature of matter and the nature of sin. At the end of the discussion, the Savior departs leaving the disciples distraught and anxious. According to the story, Mary speaks up with words of comfort and encouragement. Then Peter asks Mary to share with them any special teaching she received from the Savior, “Peter said to Mary, ‘Sister, we know that the Savior loved you more than the rest of the women. Tell us the words of the Savior which you remember—which you know (but) we do not, nor have we heard them.’” [11] Mary responds to Peter’s request by recounting a conversation she had with the Savior about visions.

   (Mary) said, "I saw the Lord in a vision and I said to him, ‘Lord, I saw you today in a vision.’" He answered and said to me: “Blessed are you, that you did not waver at the sight of me. For where the mind is, there is the treasure." I said to him, "So now, Lord, does a person who sees a vision see it <through> the soul <or> through the spirit?" [10]

In the conversation, the Savior teaches that the inner self is composed of soul, spirit/mind, and a third mind that is between the two which sees the vision. Then the text breaks off and the next four pages are missing. When the narrative resumes, Mary is no longer recalling her discussion with the Savior. She is instead recounting the revelation given to her in her vision. The revelation describes an ascent of a soul, which as it passes on its way to its final rest, engages in dialogue with four powers that try to stop it.

The Berlin Codex

The book Reinhardt bought in Cairo in 1896 turned out to be a fifth-century papyrus codex. Papyrus was the most common writing material of the day, but codices, the precursor of our book form, had come into use only a couple of centuries earlier, primarily among Christians. The codex was made by cutting papyrus rolls into sheets, which then were stacked in a single pile, usually made up of at least 38 sheets. Folding the pile in half and sewing the sheets together produced a book of about 152 pages, which was finally placed inside a leather cover. The Gospel of Mary is a short work, taking up only the first 18% pages of a codex that itself is relatively small in size, having leaves that measure on average only about 12.7 cm long and 10.5 cm wide.

Papyrus Rylands 463 (PRyl)

This Greek fragment of the Gospel of Mary was acquired by the Rylands Library in Manchester, England, in 1917, and published in 1938 by C. H. Roberts. Like POxy 3525, it was found at Oxyrhynchus in northern Egypt, and dates to the early third century CE. It is a fragment from a codex—it has writing on both sides of the papyrus leaf—and exhibits a very clear literary script. It measures 8.7 cm wide by 10 cm long, although most fibers measure only 8.5. cm. The front of the fragment contains the conclusion of Mary's revelation and the beginning of the disciples' dispute over her teaching. After a short gap, the dispute continues on the other side of the fragment.

The Egyptian copis were written in Hieroglyph, Hieratic, and Demotic.
However the Egyptian Christians copied it in Copts ( Coptic ) which was only used by them.

"… Will m[a]tter then be utterly [destr]oyed or not?" The Savior replied, "Every nature, every modeled form, every creature, exists in and with each other. They will dissolve again into their own proper root. For the nature of matter is dissolved into what belongs to its nature. Anyone with two ears able to hear should listen!" Then Peter said to him, "You have been explaining every topic to us; tell us one other thing. What is the sin of the world?" The Savior replied, "There is no such thing as sin; rather you yourselves are what produces sin when you act in accordance with the nature of adultery, which is called 'sin.' For this reason, the Good came among you, pursuing (the good) which belongs to every nature. It will set it within its root." Then he continued. He said, "This is why you get si[c]k and die: because [you love] what de[c]ei[ve]s [you]. [Anyone who] thinks should consider (these matters)! "[Ma]tter gav[e bi]rth to a passion which has no Image because it derives from what is contrary to nature. A disturbing confusion then occurred in the whole body. That is why I told you, 'Become content at heart, while also remaining discontent and disobedient; indeed become contented and agreeable (only) in the presence of that other Image of nature.' Anyone with two ears capable of hearing should listen!" When the Blessed One had said these things, he greeted them all. "Peace be with you!" he said. "Acquire my peace within yourselves! "Be on your guard so that no one deceives you by saying, 'Look over here!' or 'Look over there!' For the child of true Humanity exists within you. Follow it! Those who search for it will find it. "Go then, preac[h] the good news about the Realm. [Do] not lay down any rule beyond what I determined for you, nor promulgate law like the lawgiver, or else you might be dominated by it." After he had said these things, he departed from them. But they were distressed and wept greatly. "How are we going to go out to the rest of the world to announce the good news about the Realm of the child of true Humanity?" they said. "If they did not spare him, how will they spare us?" Then Mary stood up. She greeted them all, addressing her brothers and sisters, "Do not weep and be distressed nor let your hearts be irresolute. For his grace will be with you all and will shelter you. Rather we should praise his greatness, for he has prepared us and made us true Human beings." When Mary had said these things, she turned their heart [to]ward the Good, and they began to deba[t]e about the wor[d]s of [the Savior]. Peter said to Mary, "Sister, we know that the Savior loved you more than all other women. Tell us the words of the Savior that you remember, the things which you know that we don't because we haven't heard them." Mary responded, "I will teach you about what is hidden from you." And she began to speak these words to them. She said, "I saw the Lord in a vision and I said to him, 'Lord, I saw you today in a vision.' He answered me, 'How wonderful you are for not wavering at seeing me! For where the mind is, there is the treasure.' I said to him, 'So now, Lord, does a person who sees a vision see it <with> the soul <or> with the spirit?' The Savior answered, 'A person does not see with the soul or with the spirit. 'Rather the mind, which exists between these two, sees the vision an[d] that is w[hat … ]'

(Pages 11-14 are missing.)

" '… it.' "And Desire said, 'I did not see you go down, yet now I see you go up. So why do you lie since you belong to me?' "The soul answered, 'I saw you. You did not see me nor did you know me. You (mis)took the garment (I wore) for my (true) self. And you did not recognize me.' "After it had said these things, it left rejoicing greatly. "Again, it came to the third Power, which is called 'Ignorance.' [It] examined the soul closely, saying, 'Where are you going?You are bound by wickedness. Indeed you are bound! Do not judge!' "And the soul said, 'Why do you judge me, since I have not passed judgement?I have been bound, but I have not bound (anything). They did not recognize me, but I have recognized that the universe is to be dissolved, both the things of earth and those of heaven.' "When the soul had brought the third Power to naught, it went upward and saw the fourth Power. It had seven forms. The first form is darkness; the second is desire; the third is ignorance; the fourth is zeal for death; the fifth is the realm of the flesh; the sixth is the foolish wisdom of the flesh; the seventh is the wisdom of the wrathful person. These are the seven Powers of Wrath. "They interrogated the soul, 'Where are you coming from, human-killer,and where are you going, space-conqueror?' "The soul replied, saying, 'What binds me has been slain, and what surrounds me has been destroyed, and my desire has been brought to an end, and ignorance has died. In a [wor]ld, I was set loose from a world [an]d in a type, from a type which is above, and (from) the chain of forgetfulness which exists in time. From this hour on, for the time of the due season of the aeon, I will receive rest i[n] silence.' " After Mary had said these things, she was silent, since it was up to this point that the Savior had spoken to her. Andrew responded, addressing the brothers and sisters, "Say what you will about the things she has said, but I do not believe that the S[a]vior said these things, f[or] indeed these teachings are strange ideas." Peter responded, bringing up similar concerns. He questioned them about the Savior: "Did he, then, speak with a woman in private without our knowing about it?Are we to turn around and listen to her?Did he choose her over us?" Then [M]ary wept and said to Peter, "My brother Peter, what are you imagining?Do you think that I have thought up these things by myself in my heart or that I am telling lies about the Savior?" Levi answered, speaking to Peter, "Peter, you have always been a wrathful person. Now I see you contending against the woman like the Adversaries. For if the Savior made her worthy, who are you then for your part to reject her?Assuredly the Savior's knowledge of her is completely reliable. That is why he loved her more than us. "Rather we should be ashamed. We should clothe ourselves with the perfect Human, acquire it for ourselves as he commanded us, and announce the good news, not laying down any other rule or law that differs from what the Savior said." After [he had said these] things, they started going out [to] teach and to preach.